2008 Digital Point & Shoot Winners

 

Grand Prize Winner

©Logan Black

 

 

Category Winners

 

Abstract

First Place

©Leonard Carr

Second Place

©Sara Kerscher

Third Place

©Sara Kerscher

Honorable Mention

©K. Sue Hauser

Honorable Mention

©Shannon Lemon

 

Flora Category

 

First Place

©Logan Black

Second Place

©Shannon Lemon

Third Place

©Lauren Black

Honorable Mention

©Lauren Black

Honorable Mention

©Leonard Carr

 

Landscape

 

First Place

©Marcy Bajraszewski

Second Place

©Caileigh Telfer

Third Place

©Sue Frizzell

Honorable Mention

©Mary Marsh

Honorable Mention

©John Grogan

 

Human Interest

 

First Place

©Olivia Johnson

Second Place

©Brooke Townsend

Third Place

©Kelly Scott

Honorable Mention

©Lauren Black

Honorable Mention

©Holly Hoffman

 

Wildlife

 

First Place

©Sara Kerscher

Second Place

©Brooke Townsend

Third Place

©Tyler McManaway

Honorable Mention

©Sara Kerscher

Honorable Mention

©Mary Marsh

Photographer's Choice

©Roger Puterbaugh

 

Below you will find a selection of entries and scores listed for the digital entries that advanced to the "final round" of judging this year. This information is being shared at the request of many of you who have emailed suggestions or placed comments in our suggestion box during the events, asking for the scores. Hopefully, the information will provide insight regarding just how close many of entries were, and how well those final entries scored.

For those who may not be aware, each entry (which bears a unique ID number) is placed by its owner into an appropriate category: Landscape, Flora, Wildlife, Human Impact, and Abstract (a separate Photographer's Choice--which is an "open" category--is voted by the contestants).

All entries then enter what we call the first judging round. This phase is where it is determined by our five judges as to whether or not an entry advances to the "final round." Due to the number of entries (5 per photographer), it is impossible to grade and assign and numbered score to every entry in the time restraints of a "weekend event" such as this. Although it would be nice for every entry to have a "score number," it is more practical to use the judges' time to grade those entries that will be contenders for prizes.

FINAL ROUND--After each judge separately scores an entry in four grading areas (which are outlined in the rules: Artistic Merit & Composition, Technical Quality, Originality, and Level of Photographic Challenge), the entry is tallied by two score auditors who enter the data into a spreadsheet program. These scores later identify the photographer with the highest score in the Digital Division

We hope that by providing this requested information, we will make "Shoot the Hills" an even better contest to enter.

Our appreciation is extended to all who entered the contest and supported this fundraising activity of the Friends of the Hocking Hills State Park. Congratuations to all the finalists!


Digital Division Scores

Abstract Category
Flora Category
Landscape Category
ID Number
Score
ID Number
Score
ID Number
Score
578A
149
557B
165
568A
157
562A
147
564B
161
551A
147
562B
136
558A
145
567B
138
561A
132
558B
138
556A
136
564B
125
578A
137
579B
135
558A
122
555A
136
 
577B
133
564A
129


Human Interest
Cate
gory

Wildlife Category
ID Number
Score
ID Number
Score
571A
163
557A
169
554A
148
562B
156
563A
148
554A
144
558A
142
575A
143
555A
139
562A
140
552A
136
556A
120
574B
136
563B
135

 

Shoot the Hills
Photography Competition
P.O. Box 333
Chillicothe, OH 45601
(740) 774-6243
Images & Content © remain with the photographers and Shoot the Hills
Photography Competition, All Rights Reserved

Updated April 22, 2008
Website Design © Images Unique, LLC
Contact Webmaster